ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The quality of care for the chronically ill is to be improved through interprofessional cooperation (IPC). To date, evaluation projects on IPC have mostly focused on the inpatient sector. The aim was to use a multiple case study design to investigate forms of IPC in primary care and to identify facilitating and inhibiting factors. Factors that facilitated the implementation of IPC included having a responsible person employed to provide the service, supportive training, and the introduction of evidence-based interventions. There appeared to be insufficient incentives to implement IPC and the needs of the chronically ill were poorly integrated. More systematic evaluation of IPC initiatives is needed to demonstrate their added value. Greater integration of patient needs is key.
Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care , Outpatients , Humans , Switzerland , Chronic Disease , Delivery of Health CareABSTRACT
While volunteering is an essential factor in service delivery in many societal areas, the inclusion of volunteers in formal settings can also lead to tensions. In this article, we combine the literature on volunteering and inter-professional collaboration (IPC) to elaborate a framework regarding remedies for tensions between professional staff and volunteers within IPC in health care provision to ensure successful collaboration. Using a dyadic survey design to interview volunteers and volunteer managers, we show that the perspectives of volunteers and volunteer managers on the antecedents of effective IPC differ in paradoxical ways. While volunteer managers apply organizational logic concerning tasks and processes to avoid tensions, volunteers seek solutions on a relational basis. However, rather than trying to resolve these paradoxes, our study indicates that carefully managing tensions arising between volunteers and professional staff may be more successful than trying to resolve all tensions.
